wow, it's also not like their code was actually good (though this apply to most enterprise software). To hide a client behind closed source (it's also typescript, so even more baffling) is laughable behavior.

▲

flutas an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I'm also wondering if it's even legally valid?

They constantly love to talk about Claude Code being "100%" being vibe coded...and the US legal system is leaning towards that not being copyrightable.

It could still be a trade secret, but that doesn't fall under a DMCA take down.

▲

tempaccount420 20 minutes ago | parent [-]

You're confused, AI can't itself hold copyright, but the human who triggered the AI to write the code holds the copyright instead.

	▲	12 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

blcknight 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yea this is the thing that makes no sense to me. Any frontier model can unmiminize minified JS pretty decently. Obviously not everything comes through, comments and such, but I always assumed the reason it wasn't open source was to prevent an endless shitstorm of AI slop PR's, not because they were trying to protect secret sauce.