| ▲ | tpmoney 21 hours ago | |
> By the license and terms such copies are under. Which clause of the GPL requires the receiver of GPL code to agree to the terms of the GPL before being allowed to receive the source code that they are entitled to under the license? Because that would expressly contradict the first sentence of section 9:
Isn't that one of the key points to the GPL? That the provisions of it only apply to you IF you decide to distribute GPL software but that they do not impose any restrictions on the users of the software? Surely you're not suggesting that anyone who has ever seen the source code of a GPLed piece of software is permanently barred from contributing to or writing similar software under a non-GPL license simply by the fact that they received the GPLed source code.> If you copy the GPL code, and it inherits the license, as the terms say it > does, then you must also copy the license. > The GPL does not give you an unfettered right to copy, it comes with terms > and conditions protecting it under contract law. Thus, you must follow the > contract. I agree that the GPL does not give you an unfettered right to copy. But the GPL like all such licenses are still governed by copyright law. And "fair use" is an exception to the copyright laws that allow you to make copies that you are not otherwise authorized to make. No publisher can put additional terms in their book, even if they wrap it in shrinkwrap that denies you the right to use that book for various fair use purposes like quoting it for criticism or parody. The Sony terms and conditions for the Play Station very clearly forbid copying the BIOS or decompiling it. But those terms are null and void when you copy the BIOS and decompile it for making a new emulator (at least in the US) because the courts have already ruled that such use is fair use. So it is with the GPL. By default you have no right to make copies of the software at all. The GPL then grants you additional rights you normally wouldn't have under copyright law, but only to the extent that when exercising those rights, you comply with the terms of the GPL. But "Fair Use" then goes beyond that and says that for certain purposes, certain types and amounts of copies can be made, regardless of what rights the publisher does or does not reserve. This would be why the GPL specifically says:
Fair use (and its analogs in other countries) supersede the GPL. And even the GPL FAQ[1] acknowledges this fact:
[1]: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLFairUse | ||