| ▲ | fontain 3 days ago | |
GitHub is 100x the size today with 100x the product surface area. Pre-Microsoft GitHub was just a git host. Now, whether GitHub should have become what it is today is a fair question but to say “GitHub” is less stable today vs. 10 years ago ignores the significant changes. Also, much of these incidents are limited to products that are unreliable by nature, e.g: CoPilot depends on OpenAI and OpenAI has outages. The entire LLM API industry expects some requests to fail. GitHub’s reliability could stand to be improved but without narrowing down to products these sort of comparisons are meaningless. | ||
| ▲ | bigfatkitten 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Pre-Microsoft GitHub was just a git host. And even just that aspect of the service is now extremely unreliable. If outages in the LLM side can cause that to break, that would indicate some serious architectural problems. | ||
| ▲ | davebren 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Sites are supposed to get more reliable as they grow and have more resources to allocate specifically towards site reliability. | ||
| ▲ | tln 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The article provides a way to do just that - click breakdown then you can deselect any product areas. Just the Git operations show way more instability post acquisition. | ||