| ▲ | evil-olive 8 hours ago | |
> So I spent my morning reading through the HN comments and leaked source. > This was one of the first things people noticed in the HN thread. > The obvious concern, raised repeatedly in the HN thread > This was the most-discussed finding in the HN thread. > Several people in the HN thread flagged this > Some in the HN thread downplayed the leak when the original HN post is already at the top of the front page...why do we need a separate blogpost that just summarizes the comments? | ||
| ▲ | stingraycharles 23 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Because it’s very cheap to tell an LLM to write a blogpost based on a HN thread, and apparently the HN community upvotes this as well. | ||
| ▲ | nodja 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
This blog post looks to be partially AI generated as well... | ||
| ▲ | groby_b 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Because the original post was noisy and lacked a concise summary of findings. Or, more simply: Because folks wanted it enough to upvote it. | ||
| ▲ | tolerance 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
The culture here can get solipsistic. | ||