I think camp 1 would rather see ten useless things than one useful thing.

theshrike79 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Customer pays me to make it work, not make a pretty thing that doesn't work and is over budget - but pretty.

I optimise for "make it work", that's what the deal says.

If there's extra time, I might go to step two which is "make it pretty". Meaning that I go through the code and see that it's all good and proper if we need to add features later on.

▲

bdangubic 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

100% not what Camp 1 is or does. Their #1 goal is make it work. It is your #1 priority. So quite the opposite, Camp 2 will spin and make 100 "useful" (not) abstraction with the slickest imaginable code doing things you go "OMFG, how on Earth did you come up with this, insane" while during that development Camp 1 shipped 37 new features for its customers

	▲	yuye a day ago \| parent [-]
		Except one of those features has a security flaw and whoops now your entire customers file got leaked onto the darknet.