Software in general has disclaimed any warranties or fitness for purpose for as long as I can remember. This is nothing new.

▲

mcmcmc 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Will be interesting to see if those still hold any weight (in the US at least) after the latest Meta rulings established defective design as a valid reason to sue big tech for damages

	▲	dylan604 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		That's not not set yet though. It hasn't made it to appeals yet.

▲

chrisjj 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Software in general has disclaimed any warranties or fitness for purpose

This is not such a disclaimer. If Copilot fails its purpose of entertaining you, you can sue. /i

▲

wat10000 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Prohibiting the user from using it for any commercial or business purposes is definitely new!

▲

klez 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Have you really never seen any software saying "for non-commercial use only"?

	▲	flawi 8 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		When I'm paying for said software? No, I don't think I have.
	▲	wat10000 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Only when it's a free/cheap consumer version of something with a pricey business version.

▲

naikrovek 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

show me any that have claimed that they were for entertainment purposes only. sql server has never had that in its EULA. The GPL does not say that the software is for entertainment purposes only.

▲

phyzome 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's not what this is, though.

▲

jrecyclebin 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Well, except that, in this case, Copilot really is for entertainment purposes only.