| ▲ | wackget 3 days ago | |||||||
The most obvious question, I know, but... why not just use plain Bash? | ||||||||
| ▲ | SoftTalker 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Or something like Ansible? Which is battle tested, provides idempotency for most things, and has a large library of tasks it knows how to do. | ||||||||
| ▲ | mathfailure 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Scotty doesn't know... | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ks2048 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I've been writing my own "task runner" which seems to have some of the same features. I'd say some pros: A nice view of that has run (what has failed, etc.) - which otherwise could be drowned-out by stderr and stdout. Timing information for each "task". Can organize nested tasks. Save all in a structured log. | ||||||||
| ▲ | metalliqaz 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's in the title: "a beautiful" It looks nicer. I use good old GNU Make. | ||||||||