A simplistic answer would be to ensure that incentives are aligned with safety and success. Then that leads to the evergreen problem of Goodhart’s Law (when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure).

Even if it can't ever be truly fixed, at least recognizing the issues and shining daylight on decisions for some form of accountability should be a base-level approach.

▲

Cpoll 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Goodhart’s Law

Useful to be sure, but it's easier to game something like LOC than it is to game "product made money" and "nobody died."

	▲	pstuart an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Agreed. My point was that it will forever be some kind of moving target and to expect a policy framework to guarantee "good behavior" is a mistake. I emphatically believe that understanding the incentives of all the players is paramount because that is what will ultimately determine their behavior. It would be cool if there were ways to have a "Game Theory Toolkit" that could be plugged into an organizations communications that could automate the defining and detecting of those unwanted behaviors.

▲

gtowey an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Easy, put the manager on the actual mission.