| ▲ | DrJokepu 3 days ago |
| There was also DB2. DB2 was (still is) an excellent database that IBM has completely fumbled. |
|
| ▲ | chasil 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| There are three different Db2 databases. I believe the mainframe version was first. There is a version baked into the os/400 operating system (i series). Then unix/windows Db2 came last, if memory serves. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Db2 |
| |
| ▲ | DrJokepu 3 days ago | parent [-] | | I only ever worked with the Linux/Windows variant. I can’t believe I am saying this about an IBM product, but I found it to be actually rather pleasant to work with. | | |
| ▲ | cyberpunk 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It’s def got 80’s hacker movie vibes, typing “Iniate log rotation sequence;” etc just screams out for a green terminal emulator. | | |
| ▲ | anthk 2 days ago | parent [-] | | As an IBM hobbyist user, picture something worse than VMS in 'hackerdom'. IBM's mainframe OSes are like NT/OS2 taken to the total extreme with objects, because by default you don't see files but objects which might have files... or not. Imagine the antithesis of Emacs. That's an IBM environment with 3270 terminals and obtuse commands to learn. |
| |
| ▲ | hxugufjfjf 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You’d never say that if you’ve been on the inside of a mainframe DB2. shudders |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nineteen999 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| As somebody who administers several large DB2 clusters all linked together with multiple replication modes (HADR, SQLREP) for an emergency services communication platform, I can confirm this. It's pretty damn rock solid even on Linux these days. |
|
| ▲ | gorjusborg 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's very amusing to me that you bring up IBM in a discussion of the value of Oracle. I came here to say that if you want to understand Oracle's value, think IBM with less history. |
| |
| ▲ | DrJokepu 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Kind of, but there are some subtle differences in my opinion. Oracle is top-to-bottom evil, whose business model basically boils down to screwing over their clients and everyone else at every possible opportunity, comparable to the likes of McKinsey or Accenture. IBM is a bit more nuanced. My wife grew up in an IBM town and a lot of her family and her friends’ families used to work there in the 70s and 80s. People, especially the engineers, used to take pride in their work there. | | |
| ▲ | RankingMember 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I think of IBM and GE as being cut from the same cloth back then- they treated their people well and dominated their markets. | |
| ▲ | soperj 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Didn't they famously help both the Nazis and Apartheid South Africa? | | |
| ▲ | 20after4 3 days ago | parent [-] | | Yes. Leased IBM equipment was a critical infrastructure component of the holocaust. |
|
|
|
