Write code to connect this system with that system. Teach people what setting does what. Integrate with Entra ID. Create custom reports that hordes of Executive on our side want. Scale out the system from undersized nodes we originally gave it. That's all I picked up by just listening to them. I wasn't involved in the project, just sat nearby listening to it.

This is extremely customizable software that is designed to pretty much run your entire business and touched by over 40k employees. It requires a ton of care and feeding. There is plenty of people who dedicate themselves to PeopleSoft. Zip Recruiter is showing 5 jobs near me for "PeopleSoft Administrator"

▲

odyssey7 3 days ago | parent [-]

The need to teach people what setting does what is a sort of consulting moat that AI dismantles when it can access the right context.

▲

zdragnar 3 days ago | parent [-]

They don't make any of the documentation for those settings easy to find or understand because the support contracts make them so much money.

▲

odyssey7 3 days ago | parent [-]

Before, that could create a moat.

Soon, it will be table stakes to put scattered internal communications, notes, documents into an AI’s knowledge base, where the information can no longer hide.

When that fails, the AI can read the code itself, so that the settings and how to change them are easily explained in simple terms. Actually, this is possibly even better than letting the scattered internal information serve as an intermediate layer.

	▲	zdragnar 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		That works for small customers who actually want to spend time customizing things themselves. Big customers love having to sign support contracts, because it gives them someone to blame when something goes wrong. Nobody else gets to touch any of the settings or knobs to avoid breaking anything. Being big is the actual moat.