| ▲ | ur-whale 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> I think OpenSCAD is currently the best and most feature complete choice As much as I love OpenSCAD, I would strongly disagree with your conclusion. All the OpenSCAD language can do is boolean operations and moreover, the engine can only implement those on polygonal (triangle actually) meshes. That's a very far cry from what a modern commercial CAD engine can do. For example, the following things are very, very hard to do, or even specify using OpenScad:
I might have misunderstood what you're looking to do, but, yeah, digging deeper feels very much like the right thing to do. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | FeepingCreature 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
(my) fncad doesn't have the querying, but it does have smooth csg! https://fncad.github.io/ | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Zekio 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
using BOSL2 alleviates most issues I've run into with OpenScad for chamfers and the like, but it is an extra set of functions you need to remember sadly | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hrmtst93837 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[dead] | |||||||||||||||||