> Of 129 active groups, the top five posted 3,027 of the 7,655 claims (40%). After them, the field fragments quickly.

Does it?

The 4th group accounted for 5.0%, 5th was 4.5%, 6th was 3.4% and 10th was 2.5%, I think it doesn't fragment particularly any more quickly after the top 5 than within the top 5.

Is this LLM analysis?

▲

thes1lv3r 5 hours ago | parent [-]

They don't mention it explicitly on the website that I could find, but the product goals and stated functionality lean heavily in the LLM direction.

The text also reads very LLM-like, so I'd say yes.

	▲	wongarsu 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Always a bit harder to tell with marketing pieces because both LLMs and marketing love certain patterns and heavily lean on saying things that seem meaningful but are actually non-sequiturs. But I agree that this seems at least LLM-assisted