| ▲ | bluegatty 12 hours ago | |||||||
US forces are not partisan and not culled, they're mostly the same entity they were last year, but with a few Generals asked to retire. (Edit: highly professional I might add. There are quirks, and obvious hints of 'nationalist bias' - but that's to be expected. They are not the 'cultural problem' we see on the news - at least not for now. They lean 'normal') The current Joint Chiefs is a bit obsequious but he's not crazy. These are very sane people, for the most part. They may be pressed to do something risky, like land troops at Kharg island, but not completely suicidal. That 'risk' may entail getting a number of soldiers captured, but that's not on the extreme side of military failure, it's mostly geopolitical failure. It would certainly end DJT as a popular movement. Having a ship hit, or a few soldiers captured - and this sounds morose - is normal. That's why they exist. It's the political fallout that's deadly. They won't do anything to crazy. The craziest thing they could do is 'full invasion' and Congress won't allow that. It's very unpopular and DJT has populist instinct as well - he's trying to 'find a way out'. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pjc50 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
> They won't do anything to crazy. I don't know, they've been talking up a lot of crazy stuff, like strikes on desalination facilities and the power grid. > The craziest thing they could do is 'full invasion' and Congress won't allow that. Genuninely unclear to me whether Congress has control here; don't they currently have a Republican majority who will agree to anything anyway? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | cyanydeez 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Theyre culling all branches for loyalty. You arnt paying attention or you thinl those who arnt being promoted are more DEI. THE rest of your screed follows from inattentive disorder. | ||||||||
| ||||||||