If you need expect perfection then we will never have a space mission.

Let the astronauts give informed consent. If they mission is to dangerous for NASA then we can only hope, ISRO, CNSA or ROSCOSMOS will go.

▲

pavlov 7 hours ago | parent [-]

The point is that a $100B mission that’s still dangerous and only replicates 1960s achievements is completely pointless.

If they had set out to replicate the Moon landing at much lower cost and a controlled risk, that could have been different. Now they ended up with a very expensive, unsafe, and uninteresting mission - the worst possible combination.

	▲	rustyhancock 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So what's your point? Spend more on a project that is complete but not up to your standard? Or Extend the mission to something novel? Some how without ballooning the project? Neither is possible in the slightest. For what it's worth the Apollo program adjusted for inflation is pushing 200bn USD compared to Artemis 100bn. The Artemis programme is far safer than the Apollo program in terms of risk, Apollo sampled a much flatter high risk curve just 7 times. Bottom line let the Astronauts decide what they consider safe enough they're very smart people and deserve to be allowed to give informed consent.