| ▲ | DoctorOetker 12 hours ago | |||||||
could the government rent out monopoly grants for televised football on the moon in exchange for sponsoring manned space exploration? | ||||||||
| ▲ | xp84 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
If the NFL were to somehow become involved, you can bet that they'd somehow manage to turn the financials around and get some of that sweet government money flowing in their direction, just like the dozens of taxpayer-funded or otherwise tax-advantaged stadium deals in the past 25 years that allow us to thank Big Football financially for gracing us with the presence of football teams. It is astounding to me how such a successful, rich group of companies manage to get subsidies in quantities that groups you'd think deserve or need it more, from valuable science endeavours to orphans dying of cancer, can only dream of. | ||||||||
| ▲ | gorgoiler 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Is there any research on the effect of apparent gravitational field strength on sports? I’d be willing to bet that rocketry and artillery takes account of 50mm/s2 difference at the equator. While the difference is obviously tiny, the margins in modern sports are also miniscule. Do Fijian rugby games see a 0.5% increase in longest drop goal distance? | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | eru 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Which government? The moon doesn't belong to any one government. Though the US could just do it. Who's to stop them from selling these pieces of paper? | ||||||||
| ▲ | trhway 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
just wait until influencers start flying there. Not on SLS of course. Flyby on Starship cattle class - say 100 people (500 for LEO and "SFO to Shanghai" while for Moon - several days would require better accommodations, thus 100) - at $5M/launch, 10 launches (9 of them - tankers) - thus $50M 3 day roundtrip for 100 people. Half a mil per person. | ||||||||