Nobody forces you to use touchscreen exclusively?

If that's the case then the interface will remain a compromise that has to work for both point and touch, and ends up being suboptimal for both. Touch input necessitates bigger hit targets, lots of additional negative space around important buttons rather than groups, and a much lower information density on anything that has a click/touch handler like a list in order to avoid accidental presses. Apps need to be written with a touch UI in mind to work well.

	▲	ThoAppelsin 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The line of thinking here applies to accessibility features as well. Luckily, it is uncool to say those things against the accessibility features, and there are even many good preemptive positive arguments, such as “a good design with accessibility in mind benefits everyone”. And those same arguments do apply for touch-enabled design as well; a good design with touch input in mind can benefit all.
	▲	cosmic_cheese 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It will likely compromise anti-glare performance too, since an oleophobic treatment will be required for the screen to not instantly be covered in a haze of fingerprints. For someone who has no use for touch this is a strict downgrade. The only way touch on MacBooks can make a shred of sense is if it’s a non-default option in the configurator, much like the current nanotexture matte option.

▲

VerifiedReports 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

You say that now. And yet Apple now forces you to use shitty Bluetooth headphones to listen to its most popular music player.

▲

thebruce87m 2 days ago | parent [-]

What product are you referring to? One where you can’t use USB-C headphones or an adapter?

▲

VerifiedReports a day ago | parent [-]

Not while you're charging.

▲

thebruce87m a day ago | parent [-]

Not while you’re charging via USB-C

I’ve got a MagSafe nightstand and powerbank that both leave the port free. I do use Bluetooth for audio so I don’t actually ever use the USB-C port at all.

▲

VerifiedReports an hour ago | parent [-]

Yeah, because I want to junk up my car with all that crap. You're just admitting that your "thin, elegant" Apple product becomes a Christmas tree of dongles to make it practical.

	▲	thebruce87m an hour ago \| parent [-]
		lol, it seems like you got out of the wrong side of the bed. My car (Tesla) has in-built Qi charging and a place to put both the driver and passenger phones, along with Bluetooth. I literally never use a cable with my phone.