| ▲ | altairprime a day ago | |||||||
There are a lot of better ways to present your point; for example: How many batteries supplied with Elon Musk’s companies’ products have encountered an unplanned combustion event after light or no damage? Does SpaceX use in-house or third-party batteries in their satellites? Is their explosion rate of 2(?) per N, where N is the number of unexploded SpaceX satellites, plausibly still within the statistical ranges defined by non-SpaceX satellites given the data available to us? Did the satellite deflect before it exploded or are the shard trajectories consistent with a zero-impact scenario? etc. | ||||||||
| ▲ | vrighter a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||
hate to be pedantic, but for 2 out of N, n would have to be the sum of all satellites including the exploded ones | ||||||||
| ||||||||