They’re pointing out fraud. Is that a bad thing now?

I think it’s fair game to point out that the the 30 under 30 hype list is just that: hype. And there’s often very little substance underneath hype. And sometimes there’s outright deceit under it.

I asked for an insight into their thought process and goals. The assumption that this was something bad did not come from my words but the nature of the page itself.

I have encountered many instances of fraud being highlighted. Generally it is a valuable journalistic service that I have no problem with. Most don't send the message that they have a vindictive axe to grind like this one does.

well why was Cursor included amongst known fraudsters.. that just seems mean and warrentless