Some of these really don't make sense. The implication that Cursor is a fraudulent company is a little weird considering they actually have real users.

Like sure, is it a VS code fork with agents stapled to it? Yes. But are they on the same scale as most of the people mentioned? Ehh probably not.

It reads more like a hit piece from someone with a grudge against random SF companies than anything else.

> The implication that Cursor is a fraudulent company is a little weird

To my reading the premise of the site is pretty straightforward: 30 Under 30 is a warning sign, not a positive signal. Therefore, as a company with 4 founders who were in 30 Under 30, Cursor is a risk.

It’s a silly little satire site, there’s a danger of reading into it too deeply.

It looks like the score number is just the number of times featured multiplied by a constant.

Maybe it was added after your comment but that section has a warning box calling the score a "deliberately absurd formula" and saying "this is comedy" in literal bold letters at the top. No one thinks it's serious and it's even clearly labeled as a joke just in case.

What is a “satirical risk analysis” and am I to believe that the bottom section is built from anonymous submissions?

They should have left off the last section. No reason to shame founders if no wrong doing