| ▲ | gautamcgoel 4 hours ago | |||||||
Wait, I'm confused. Do you mean Boston should have made non-compete agreements illegal? | ||||||||
| ▲ | Twirrim 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Massachusetts used to be one of the most favourable states for non-compete agreements, with strong legal protection and support, favouring companies. Not sure if that has changed since the last time I looked (been a few years). | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ChuckMcM 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Yes. At the time, non-compete agreements were legal (and commonplace) in Massachusetts. I haven't followed the Boston tech news for a decade so they may have changed that. But I had this exact conversation with Senator Ed Markey who was a congressman at the time. He was in the Bay Area and I was one of the people who were invited to a dinner he held on "Technology and Innovation." | ||||||||
| ||||||||