| ▲ | colechristensen 5 hours ago | |||||||
As the years go buy I'm gradually more and more in favor of restrictions to sell businesses. They tend to benefit two groups: the people running a successful business and the people running the even more successful businesses buying them. They tend not to benefit the employees, the customers, the competitors and really anyone else besides a small number of people who are already very successful. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dismalaf 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Not all businesses are wildly successful. Some are just successful enough to provide a single family with a middle class income. For some people, selling that is their only hope of retirement. It's not like the seller never has an option to say no to the non-compete. | ||||||||
| ▲ | logicchains 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Then nobody creates businesses in your state and everyone there loses. What person in their right mind would invest their time and money into a business they wouldn't be able to sell? | ||||||||
| ▲ | richwater 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This is quite a stupid idea: you kill all innovative behavior if a creator can't decide to sell his creation. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | BurningFrog 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
All voluntary transactions benefits both buyer and seller. This is as it should be! | ||||||||
| ||||||||