Remix.run Logo
colechristensen 5 hours ago

As the years go buy I'm gradually more and more in favor of restrictions to sell businesses. They tend to benefit two groups: the people running a successful business and the people running the even more successful businesses buying them.

They tend not to benefit the employees, the customers, the competitors and really anyone else besides a small number of people who are already very successful.

dismalaf 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Not all businesses are wildly successful. Some are just successful enough to provide a single family with a middle class income. For some people, selling that is their only hope of retirement.

It's not like the seller never has an option to say no to the non-compete.

logicchains 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Then nobody creates businesses in your state and everyone there loses. What person in their right mind would invest their time and money into a business they wouldn't be able to sell?

richwater 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is quite a stupid idea: you kill all innovative behavior if a creator can't decide to sell his creation.

colechristensen 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Creators more invested in running their creation than selling it might do a better job.

BurningFrog 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

All voluntary transactions benefits both buyer and seller.

This is as it should be!

throwaway85825 3 hours ago | parent [-]

And the government exists to safeguard the benefit of the broader public. Not all transactions are legal.