Remix.run Logo
Remix clone Hacker News
new | show | ask | jobsGithub
▲ post-it 4 days ago

[flagged]

▲voidfunc 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Who cares? Did you get the point of the message or not?

People trying to detect AI and seeing red the moment their AI-sniff test fails are killing discourse.

▲post-it 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

The authors want me to trust them to handle all my passwords. I'm not going to do that if they don't respect me enough to tell me I'm reading AI-generated content.

▲voidfunc 4 days ago | parent [-]

You need to articulate why you care better. Why is "AI generated content" a problem for you specifically?

▲a456463 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

lmao... people using AI are killing discourse. and then come along bootlickers like you

▲voidfunc 4 days ago | parent [-]

You're right, it's actually the people throwing around inflammatory statements like "bootlickers" to virtue signal and score fake internet points that are doing the most harm.

▲falcor84 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Is there anything actually bad with that writing (other than implying that theirs is the first system to solve this)?

AI has been rlhf post-trained to generate text that people find to be clear to read. Are you now looking to reject clear writing just to spite AI labs?

▲antonyt 4 days ago | parent [-]

Pieces of writing don’t really exist in isolation. Your opinion of a given chunk is formed not only by it, but by everything else you have read.

So in one part the negative reaction is to staleness. Everything sounds the same.

If it was all the same but dry, terse, and to the point (like technical writing), it wouldn’t be so bad.

But it’s repetitive with an annoying, breathless, get-ready-to-be-impressed voice that many of us find grating.

▲falcor84 4 days ago | parent [-]

I agree in principle, but this is a press release, and I personally am finding AI-assisted marketing copy to be much nicer and easier to read than human copywriter-written ones.