No class action or fines for discrimination based on gender? OkCupid gave users different prices based on whether they selected male or female for their profile.

▲

john_strinlai 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>OkCupid gave users different prices based on whether they selected male or female for their profile.

never heard or thought about this before, but it kind of makes sense for a dating app. its one of the only levers available to them to attempt any sort of balance between user genders. it sucks for everyone (including the users) if the male:female ratio is like 20:1 or whatever.

i would rather pay a couple of extra dollars, relative to the opposite sex, if it meant access to a wider pool of potential matches.

▲

justonceokay 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If your main problem with a dating app is that men pay more than women, then you’re not going to like being in a relationship very much at all :)

▲

avgDev 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Reminds of being a young guy and feeling annoyed when girls are being let into clubs for free without waiting in line, and I had to wait in line and pay. Sometimes I could not get in because the club was "full", but the girls would be allowed in.

▲

mont_tag 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If the service is free, you are the product :-)

▲

duped 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It used to be that promoters were paid per woman they brought to the club and nothing for men, and they would in turn charge a cover per man.

No idea how these businesses operate now. I'm sure there's still sliding scales of sliminess based on the quality of the club and its management.

	▲	deltoidmaximus 30 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Aren't they going out of business in large numbers? I'm not sure how much of that has to do with the dating scene as much as it has to do with younger people drinking less though.

▲

hamdingers 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you exclude bots and otherwise fake accounts the ratio is much worse than 20:1.

▲

john_strinlai 3 hours ago | parent [-]

that sucks!

whatever more accurate numbers you want to substitute in there is fine, the point remains the same.

	▲	hamdingers 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		My point is that what you're being asked to pay for is wildly misrepresented. To be more explicit: you're paying extra to give more porn bots access to your inbox.

▲

loeg 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The ratio is that bad anyway.

▲

CoastalCoder 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Does anything in the FTC action prevent users from filing their own class action suit(s)?

(Sincere question, not snark)

▲

Acrobatic_Road 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's so much shady and unethical behavior from these companies I'm surprised there's not more lawsuits and litigation against them.