There are glasses that do only captions, no recording or camera.

The article says "any eyewear with video and audio recording capability" which makes sense. Although even that is unreasonably specific and should just say "recording or transmission device" to ban the activity and not the item.

▲

randallsquared 3 days ago | parent [-]

Pretty sure any device which subtitles audio could be used to record that audio.

	▲	shimman 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Then it's up to the company to make a compliant device if they want it to be used in a courtroom.
	▲	1718627440 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Which is not the problem when the device has no interface to get the data out and no storage media to store it.