| ▲ | MrAlex94 14 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Librewolf and Waterfox have always had different goals. Waterfox has always had a more opinionated take on defaults and privacy. Essentially the goal has been keep the web as private as possible without breaking it (I know Librewolf is more aggressive there and that sometimes leads to website breakages) and I think I've managed that well, especially with the implementation of Oblivious DNS by default. The upside of Librewolf being a community project is also IMO its downside - there isn't any accountability and with the current climate around the world becoming more hostile to online services, I think governance is hugely important, which is why I've tried to collate everything as much as I can: https://www.waterfox.com/docs/policies/company-information/ At the end of the day, if something goes wrong, at least with Waterfox I can be held accountable. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | adrianwaj 13 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
There was a recent comment: "if you don't know: any browser extension can read input/password fields across all site(s) you gave it access to (yeah, it's crazy but unfortunately true)." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47553048 Would either WF or LW fix that? Is it true? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||