| ▲ | buildbot 17 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Naively as a West Coast Verilog person, VHDL Delta cycles seem like a nice idea, but not what actual circuits are doing by default. The beauty and the terror of Verilog is the complete, unconstrained parallel nature of it’s default - it all evaluates at t=0 by default, until you add clocks and state via registers. VHDL seems easy to create latches and other abominations too easily. (I am probably wrong at least partially.) ((Shai-Hulud Desires the Verilog)) | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | oelang 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
(System)Verilog has delta cycles too you know, they call it an event queue, but it's basically the same. It's the direct variable updates that happen outside of this mechanism that cause all the issues. Imho it was a poor attempt at simulation optimization, and now you can't take it out of the language anymore. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tverbeure 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
AFAIK, creating latches is just as easy in Verilog as in VHDL. They use the same model to determine when to create one. But with a solid design flow (which should include linting tools like Spyglass for both VHDL and Verilog), it’s not a major concern. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | hrmtst93837 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Verilog gives you enough rope. Once the design gets past toy size, you spend time chasing sim vs synthesis mismatches because the language leaves ordering loose in places where humans read intent into source order. VHDL's delta cycles are weird, and there's edge cases there too, but the extra ceremony works more like a childproof cap than a crown jewel. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||