So we'll have 100 2-star repositories per software developer containing stolen code and that is somehow a good thing?

It is completely delusional that these copied "works" will have any effect or be used by anyone but the most rabid AI proponents just to make a point.

▲

Grokify 3 days ago | parent [-]

If there's any stolen code generated by AI, it's certainly not intentional and a DMCA notice would be appreciated. It would be interesting to see how prevalent this is in AI generated code - is anyone doing a study?

Stars will likely go up over time, but more than the stars it's the testing and maintenance over time that's valuable. There's little promotion right now, but there are already some stars, PRs, and issues. In fact, I'm working on merging PRs now.

▲

gf000 2 days ago | parent [-]

Well, is slightly modified regurgitated code a copy or not? We have yet to have it answered in the age of AI, but e.g. I could not be selling Mickey Mouse merch with a simple color filter on for long.

	▲	Grokify 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Agree it will be interesting to see how things play out. There's enough permissive open-source licensed code available that using that only could be an option. As for Mickey, is the difference from Oswald enough today?