Free software has never mattered more.

All the infrastructure that runs the whole AI-over-the-internet juggernaut is essentially all open source.

Heck, even Claude Code would be far less useful without grep, diff, git, head, etc., etc., etc. And one can easily see a day where something like a local sort Claude Code talking to Open Weight and Open Source models is the core dev tool.

It's not just that open source code is useful in an age of AI, it's that the AI could only have been made because of the open source code.

> All the infrastructure that runs the whole AI-over-the-internet juggernaut is essentially all open source.

Exactly.

> Heck, even Claude Code would be far less useful without grep, diff, git, head, etc.

It wouldn't even work. It's constantly using those.

I remember reading a Claude Code CLI install doc and the first thing was "we need ripgrep" with zero shame.

All these tools also all basically run on top of Linux: with Claude Code actually installing, on Windows and MacOS, a full linux VM on the system.

It's all open-source command line tools, an open-source OS and piping program one to the other. I'm on Linux on the desktop (and servers ofc) since the Slackware days... And I was right all along.

> Free software has never mattered more.

But the Libre part of Free Software has never mattered less, at least so TFA argues and while I could niggle with the point, it's not wrong.

Wow, some corps could offload some of their costs to "the community" (unpair labor), while end users are as disenfranchised as ever! How validating!

Why isnt LLM training itself open sourced? With all the compute in the world, something like Folding@home here would be killer