| ▲ | superultra 5 hours ago |
| I’ve taken this line - as many have and do all the time. Ride it once and you’ll realize why it’s the better way to travel in every way but cost and time - and both of those are a result of the United State unwillingness to fully fund something like Amtrak. As the author states traveling by train just a more pleasant experience. I should note that even though there is technically wifi on every Amtrak train, it’s cellular based. You’ll find that at least from atlanta to NY, the train somehow threads the needle between cellular ranges. Both your phone and of course the train will often be either out of range of fast cellular service or out of range altogether. Supposedly Amtrak is getting starlink but we’ll see. So, don’t expect to be getting on any video calls. |
|
| ▲ | goalieca 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| > and both of those are a result of the United State unwillingness to fully fund something like Amtrak. What kind of funding are we looking at? Is the issue that this is cost-prohibitive for reasons of scale that make this non-competitive for businesses themselves to fund as compared to elsewhere? |
| |
| ▲ | supertrope 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Amtrak was created to preserve the last vestiges of passenger rail when private businesses pulled out. It has conflicting missions so it's never going to be competitive in service. Amtrak does not own its own rail network. It has priority over cargo trains de jure but in practice cargo takes priority. Many areas only have one set of tracks and trains can only pull over onto sidings when they exist. Class 1 railroads are capital intensive so to be more profitable they don't spend any money they don't have to. Such as more sidings, more train yards, not maximizing the length of trains so they fit onto those sidings, or more than one operator per train. Class 1 railroads are focused on cargo and making money, not helping Amtrak trains go first. The government doesn't care to enforce the law either. https://www.bls.gov/opub/btn/volume-13/tracking-productivity... Amtrak operates routes that suffer from low demand instead of focusing on the New York Washington DC route. It's about counting US Senate votes as much as customer satisfaction or breaking even. The Federal government heavily subsidized cars starting in the 1950s through the Interstate Highway System. Cars and airliners are considered critical passenger transportation infrastructure, trains are not. | | |
| ▲ | chiph 38 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The S-Line project is underway in NC and VA. It will rehabilitate an abandoned line (the former Seaboard Coast Line) to allow faster travel between Raleigh and Richmond. It won't be electrified but will allow trains to run at up to 110 mph/177 kph which is a big improvement over the current 60-70 mph (when the passenger train isn't being delayed by a freight train). They are currently doing a couple of grade-separation bridge projects in north Raleigh and some minor curve straightening. Since the S-Line is not currently being used they can straighten many of the curves since there won't be any impact to existing operations. The S-Line right of way is owned by CSX and they will be running freight on it. The budget wasn't there to acquire all of it by NCDOT and VA and dedicate it to passenger service. https://www.ncdot.gov/divisions/rail/s-line-projects/raleigh... https://vapassengerrailauthority.org/projects/richmond2ralei... |
|
|
|
| ▲ | aziaziazi 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m curious if a classic starlings antenna works at 100-300 km/h with occasional rotation, or will it need to be mounted on a targeting motor on top of the train? |
| |
| ▲ | hdgvhicv 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Works on planes at 1000km/h so should be fine on trains in the open countryside (not in tunnels of course) | | |
|
|
| ▲ | standardUser 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Years ago I tried to book a train from San Francisco to Chicago as part of a trip I had planned but found it to be more expensive and, more significantly, a multi-day journey instead of a few hours. If you happen to be an American living near one of the useful passenger rail lines, and desire to go to one of the few destinations it can take you to quickly and affordably, more power to you. But most Americans live nowhere near a useful rail system. |
| |
| ▲ | JKCalhoun 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Taking days to get to Chicago from Emeryville is all part of the fun of it. Enjoy the journey… | | |
| ▲ | standardUser 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Spoken like one of the small percentage of Americans who can afford to tag on extra days to their PTO to enjoy a nice view. | | |
| ▲ | JKCalhoun 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I guess so. We took the girls when they were young to Omaha a few times from the Bay Area. I wasn't even sure passenger trains would be around when they were adults so wanted to give them that experience. I took a train between Kansas City and Chicago as a kid and found it magical. So, yeah, the train ride was actually a significant part of the experience for those particular vacations. |
|
|
|
