This is interesting! People ignoring this, I think, is also interesting on its own. I respect if other people disagree, but that's my 2c. I think our overton windows may not agree here, but I think this is part of the value of discussions with other humans.

Are you a moderator? The directive tone of this post is as if from an authority figure, but, but I do not believe you are one.

I do not believe there is anything about a religious or ideological background here. Could you please clarify?

I also believe it is your post that could be more accurately described as trampling curiosity; I believe there is a role reversal, in that I think your comment is a better description for trampling curiosity than the post your are responding. I'm not trying to be snarky - I'm curious how you came to those conclusions.

The tone of the GP is such because it's a quote from the rules/guidelines. However, applying that rule to what you said makes no sense to me, fwiw.

>This is interesting!

No it's not. After a decade of the US-centric coastal leftist obsession with race and gender it is not interesting. It's about as interesting as Christians commenting on abortion.

>Are you a moderator? The directive tone of this post is as if from an authority figure, but, but I do not believe you are one.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

>I do not believe there is anything about a religious or ideological background here. Could you please clarify?

US leftist's obsession with race and gender is religious/ideological.

>I also believe it is your post that could be more accurately described as trampling curiosity; I believe there is a role reversal, in that I think your comment is a better description for trampling curiosity than the post your are responding.

This is what every religious/ideological zealot says when they're denied a platform to spew their nonsense.

Please review the guidelines linked above.