>your ability to not address my argument main point is something to behold. can't tell if you're doing on purpose or not.

Or maybe you're just terrible at writing.

>if humans read my blog posts and then things without credit that would be fine.

I'm not sure how I (or anyone) was supposed to come away with this conclusion when you were writing stuff like:

"i'm ok with giving the recipe for free, i just want my name out there"

"the very human need to be recognized for something created"

"they want their name attached and their contribution recognized".

there is nothing contradictory in what i said, and if you weren't favoring a very literal interpretation of my argument you would agree.

but, in the spirit of critical reading education, what i meant is: human attention good, machine ingestion bad.