| ▲ | nkrisc 8 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Some basic investigatory police work (the kind they did before AI) would have revealed the mistake before an innocent woman’s life was destroyed. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | jqpabc123 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes. But doing the investigation negates much of the incentive for using AI. Look for similar to play out elsewhere --- using unreliable tools for decision making is not a good, responsible business plan. And lawyers are just waiting to press the point. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The article says that the Fargo police claimed to have done "additional investigative steps independent of AI". (Perhaps they're lying, or did a poor job because they thought the extra steps were a formality.) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||