Phoenix is uninhabitable precisely because it's entirely optimized for car life from what I heard? (i.e. massively spread out, no walkability, etc)

▲

httpz 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's car optimized because the 110F weather makes it un-walkable in the first place. When I lived in a walkable city, I would prefer to walk 30 minutes than drive. When I lived in Phoenix, I did not want to spend more than 30 seconds outside in the summer.

▲

fouc 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

how's the tree situation though? 110F + lots of huge trees = a lot more tolerable. trees cool shit down big time.

▲

httpz 2 hours ago | parent [-]

It's a desert so trees can't survive without irrigation. Since water is scarce as well, there aren't enough trees to cover the vast low density area.

	▲	Y-bar an hour ago \| parent [-]
		You can always start small and over decades grow the area. After all that is how cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam became bike friendly, not just a few years, but decades of work. What about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dracaena_cinnabari or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilopsis?

▲

6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]

▲

AshamedBadger56 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I suspect they were mostly referring to it being uninhabitable due to the extreme heat and duration of 100ºF+ days.

▲

dyauspitr 4 hours ago | parent [-]

A dry 100F is fine weather. I’ll take that over a midwestern winter any day.

	▲	disillusioned 26 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		100F days are fine, cakewalks, even, especially with misters + shade. We had 70+ days of 110°F two years ago, and over 20 days 115°F+. They are not the same. Those days are unbearable nightmare fuel, and worse, they turn into insanely miserable nights where the low temperature rarely dips below 95°. It is absolutely awful, dry or not.