I really want America to get on board with this. Getting people to not drive is a nearly impossible task given how slow cities move to change the codes, so if we have to have parking lots, put them to use.

▲

elihu 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I really want the US to get on board with solar in general. Parking lot solar is a good thing generally, but I don't think it should be mandatory because it's an inefficient use of resources. We don't have any shortage of rural land.

Maybe a more flexible policy could be something like: for every parking spot, you must add 1 kw of solar somewhere on your property (whether that's the parking lot or building roof or whatever is up to you) or add 2 kw of solar somewhere within a 20 miles of the site or add 3kw of solar somewhere in the US.

A lot of companies might find that the last option is the cheapest, and if that's the case we should want and encourage them to do that instead.

	▲	a_t48 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Feels a little gameable. I’d sell solar rights to some bit of land that I was already going to profitably adding solar to. It might still result in good incentives though.

▲

SpaceL10n 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you want America on board, get the people on board. Tell them why it's a good idea to stop driving their car. I'm not saying this to be snarky, but that's what it's going to take.

	▲	lefra 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I'm the perfect client for an electric car (I can charge at home, and 99% of my trips are less than 100km). I want one even. I still use my old ICE though, because the price of vehicles went through the roof those last years, which means the money I saved to replace it only gets me 60% of a car. My point is telling or convincing people is not enough. The desired outcome must be oviously practical and cheaper.
	▲	fouc 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		The problem is when the environment is already optimized for car use, when everything is massively spread out. Hard to get people to stop using cars when infra for walking is an afterthought.
	▲	cheschire 8 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		I try. But then they point to the inevitable inconvenience of not driving. Chicken and the egg. As an aside, your username reminds me it’s about time for another rewatch of cowboy bebop
	▲	dyauspitr 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Stop driving their ICE vehicle. Anti car doesn’t fly in America. People want their big spaces, privacy and most don’t want to live in cooped up apartments and spend the majority of their life within walking and public transport distance.
	▲	BurningFrog 9 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Telling me that will do nothing. You'll have to convince me!

▲

balderdash 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’d love to not have a car, but I’ve lived in five us cities - one (nyc) had public transportation that was usable - the rest public transportation was massively less efficient than driving. Until that gets fixed people are driving…

▲

yieldcrv 8 hours ago | parent [-]

massively less efficient is definitely the word, LA has some residents that swear by our trains, but do they go faster than the 1 hour 5 minute commute in traffic? Nope!

	▲	direwolf20 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The speed of traffic will always be equal to the speed of public transit. To reduce traffic jams you speed up transit. I do not remember what this always-observed effect is named.

▲

dyauspitr 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

We were on board until this administration. Even then they have to be actively hostile to solar to even make a dent in the rate of uptake.