Quality of writing matters cause it affects the comfort of reading. Slop remains slop even if the argument it holds is ok. Like here for example one question is posed and answered twice within two paragraphs distance. It reads weird, and I wouldn't expect it from a human.

> Slop remains slop even if the argument it holds is ok

This sounds more like a religious argument than a logical one, tbh

At what point does it turn into a cult?