> The game is still very popular and easy to play. But the obsoletness of DOS

Nothing obsolete about DOS when it comes to playing 2D games. Thanks to DOSBox and other emulators (FreeDOS is also not bad though) it is a fantastic OS (or virtual machine). DOS as a platform for (2D) games has never been better than it is today, on modern hardware running DOSBox.

What I like about DOSbox are its constraints and limitations.

Of course there plenty of good features missing but on the other hand that’s the point.

Why start in 2d when in reality you want a 3d game?

DOSbox is delivering constraints.

The demo scene died when the constraints were gone and all that was left was showing a movie. On a C64 for example there are no animations per se but maxing out technical prowess combined with design. If it matches optimally it will make you marvel otherwise not so much.

So there is no right or wrong only what do you want?

> Nothing obsolete about DOS when it comes to playing 2D games.

Until you want better graphics, network, touch support, etc, etc.

Some people may not want that; and there are workarounds, even in dosbox itself; still, they are just that.

The page lists similar plans in FAQ: “To add additional functionalities (features) to the game (like online gaming, scalable HQ Grahics, HQ Audio, plugins, etc.).”

86Box runs on modern MacOS, but is not very performant for games on ARM.

https://github.com/86Box/86Box

There are also patch sets available for modern PCs to support legacy MSDOS, and Windows 3.1/95/98/ME. Attempting to install/run on modern hardware will usually blue-screen without the workarounds. =3

https://github.com/JHRobotics/patcher9x

There is a win 3.1 port for wider screens that do box will run