| ▲ | Muromec 2 days ago |
| Disbanding NASA would be one of those symbolic things thay people will associate the dusk of American empire. |
|
| ▲ | readthenotes1 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Nah. It will probably be either the Space Shuttle or Artemis. That is to say, programs that showed NASA lost control of its mission to graft |
|
| ▲ | pfdietz 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Avoiding something for such symbolic reasons is negative cargo cult thinking. |
| |
| ▲ | Muromec 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | You are right and I don't think it should be avoided. It's just that, a symbolic milestone of sorts. A cutoff date. | |
| ▲ | Supermancho 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | > Avoiding something [disbanding NASA] for such symbolic reasons [???] is negative cargo cult thinking. Cargo-cult requires a rigid through-line. What criteria would you use, to choose to avoid something in order to preemptively avoid hindsight analysis? It's a nonsensical line of thinking. | | |
| ▲ | pfdietz 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Cargo cult requires a confusion of cause and effect. Airplanes carrying cargo didn't land because there was a control tower; they landed because of prior causes that also caused the construction of a control tower. And here, the US does not decline because of some symbolic action, but rather decline causes the action. This confusion of cause and effect is literally a kind of magical thinking. | | |
| ▲ | mikkupikku 2 days ago | parent [-] | | You're broadly right, but I think you're missing the part where perception of reality feeds back into reality, e.g. through economic effects. Demoralized Americans with less hope for the future stop caring, stop trying, and this in turn hastens that same decline. | | |
|
|
|
