I've been wondering how they've been able to be so generous with Composer usage with it still making business sense. Seems like this is the answer: presumably they think they'll have a competitive advantage in not just the UX space but the model space as well soon. It's a great strategy, but I do wonder if the moat will be big enough with how fast things are moving and how competitive the model landscape is.

▲

ketzo 14 hours ago | parent [-]

After seeing the last few releases for GPT and Claude, I’m not sure how anyone (else) is gonna build a durable advantage on proprietary model quality.

The capabilities of the top labs’ models have improved so much in just the last few releases, and I definitely foresee a world where they gate those models away behind 1st-party harnesses/tooling.

▲

hypercube33 13 hours ago | parent [-]

Across my 4 different gpt subscriptions (personal, personal cursor, GitHub Copilot and cursor) all gpt5 models are junk compared to v4 - constantly ignore prompts, skills, can't write c# or powershell properly the first go, up to 5 tries. Qwen3 hands down beat it on a ryzen 5800 and 6700xt GPU even though it's slow it got the code right first try.

I feel like the v5.0 preview did ok but it's slid all the way down the hill to gpt 2 or 3 levels for me.

	▲	IanCal 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Saying gpt 5.4 is like gpt2 is wild.
	▲	5 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]