| ▲ | rbalicki 3 hours ago | |||||||
The skill atrophy point strikes me as tenuous at best. Obviously, the plural of anecdote is not data, but I find myself able to work on projects of greater complexity than I would have been able to otherwise. 90% of my time is spent going back and forth on Markdown files, discussing the architecture, trade-offs, etc. I don't think it's necessarily impossible to use all this newfound power to ship more sloppier code. It's clearly possible to use all this newfound power to ship better code too. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dijksterhuis 22 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
a real study from Microsoft + Carnegie Mellon University with 319 study participants > while GenAI can improve worker efficiency, it can inhibit critical engagement with work and can potentially lead to long-term overreliance on the tool and diminished skill for independent problem-solving. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/... it's a real problem when applied to a population. | ||||||||
| ▲ | piker 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
> I find myself able to work on projects of greater complexity than I would have been able to otherwise Yes. Now turn off the LLM and make an improvement to that code. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | james-clef 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Totally agree with this taking on projects of greater complexity. I honestly feel the sloppier code thing is going to die soon. People make mistakes too. Always see people holding the machine to like this totally different standard. | ||||||||