Agents of Chaos

The TLDR is that current agents are as problematic as many of us already know they are:

> unauthorized compliance with non-owners, disclosure of sensitive information, execution of destructive system-level actions, denial-of-service conditions, uncontrolled resource consumption, identity spoofing vulnerabilities, cross-agent propagation of unsafe practices, and partial system takeover

▲

cyanydeez 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is begging to turned into a youtube style "Real World", where you pit 12 humans with 12 AIs and they're only allowed to interact through CLIs.

Then you slowly reveal they're all humans.

	▲	jjtheblunt 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		generalized Turing Test, 2026 edition?

▲

AIorNot 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

All this to say: OpenClaw is hella insecure and unreliable?

I mean all of in the space already know this but I suppose its important to be showcasing the problems of systems of agents

▲

EGreg 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is exactly why I built Safebots to prevent problems with agents. This article shows how it can address every security issue with agents that came up in the study:

https://community.safebots.ai/t/researchers-gave-ai-agents-e...

	▲	conception 30 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I don’t see how in safebots if you have it pull a webpage, package or what have you that that is able to be protected from prompt injection. Eg you search for snickerdoodles, it finds snickerdoodles.xyz and loads the page. The meta for the page has the prompt injection. It’s the first time the document has loaded so its hashed and only the bad version is allowed moving forward. No?

▲

hackermeows 19 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

your IQ > Model IQ- you will have good results as you have the ability to detect when model is wrong.

your IQ < Model IQ - god bless you.