| ▲ | kstrauser 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
So for $100 less, you get a markedly lower-DPI screen that's 40% dimmer, a slower CPU, hotter running, and a worse chassis. Almost no one's going to be slapping multiple external monitors on either of these. If they did, they might run into the problem where the Acer is often limited to 640x480: https://community.acer.com/en/discussion/733442/have-a-new-a... That is not remotely in the same category as the Neo. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | chocochunks 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
You get twice as much RAM, twice as much storage. 4x faster storage too. You get a full sized HDMI port. You can do multiple monitors if you need to. It has a fan for better sustained performance. You can plug in a flash drive, mouse, monitor or other external peripheral without a dongle. Oh, and it's actually COOLER running than the Neo. The Neo costs a $100 more, needs a $30 dongle to connect to 90% of the stuff people have, has half the RAM, half the storage, slower storage. Has considerably worse I/O. But has a better screen and build quality comparable to a MacBook Pro from 2007. It's different compromises. Personally I'd rather have more RAM, storage and IO than a prettier case and better screen. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | underlipton 9 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Can we please not have The Verge-tier PC/Mac slap fights on HN. Thanks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||