| ▲ | dmitrygr a day ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indeed anti-Xi posts are unsafe in China, and safe in UK. Equally, anti-UK posts are safe in China and not so in the UK... (eg https://www.congress.gov/119/meeting/house/118565/documents/...). The naïveté in the claim that these are significantly different reminded me of an old joke from the USSR: American: In America, we have freedom of speech. USSRian: What's that? American: I can stand in front of the White House and yell "Reagan is a moron!" and nothing will happen to me. USSRian: Well, we have that in USSR too. American: Really? USSRian: Yes, of course! I go stand in the center of the Red Square and yell "Reagan is a moron" and nothing will happen to me. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kubb a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm sorry, but you're not coherent. You're saying anti-uk posts, you're linking some heavily editorialized article from a highly ideological media outlet about an arrest "allegedly over criticising anti-trans activists". So not anti-UK posts. The arrest doesn't seem to have lead to any conviction. So not years of jail and reeducation camps like you get in China for dissent. This is exactly what I'm talking about. You put this things together and you claim they're the same. They're not even close. This makes you seem funny, unserious. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||