| ▲ | sgarland 3 hours ago | |
> often there's no real substitute for pulling a couple of terabytes locally and going to town on them. Fully agree. I already know the locations of the logs on-disk, and ripgrep - or at worst, grep with LC_ALL=C - is much, much faster than any aggregation tool. If I need to compare different machines, or do complex projections, then sure, external tooling is probably easier. But for the case of “I know roughly when a problem occurred / a text pattern to match,” reading the local file is faster. | ||