| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 7 days ago | |||||||||||||
You can do solar -> hydrolysis -> hydrogen -> ammonia-> fertilizer, rather than methane -> steam reforming -> hydrogen -> ammonia -> fertilizer. So it's technically feasible. Not quite there in terms of cost and scale but if the alternative is a blockade then probably worth investing in. Ironically some of the best locations for production are in the middle east. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Gibbon1 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
You can run the numbers the cost isn't that bad to do it that way. I think South Africa gets most of its diesel from the Fischer–Tropsch process. You could use electrolytic hydrogen as an input for that. About 40% of the energy in gasoline is from hydrogen burning. It's not great but it would allow you to run current vehicles off about 40% solar energy. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dzhiurgis 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Best part you can probably miniaturize entire process into panel itself and 5 panels per hectare would be enough... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||