| ▲ | Ralfp 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
It is not. Lisa Littmans research behind „rapid onset gender dysphoria” is a survey amongst parents recruited on three anti-trans internet sites and communities: https://psychcentral.com/lib/there-is-no-evidence-that-rapid... That by itself means its heavily biased research on a weak sample. „Stats for Gender” site is ran by Genspect, which is also a biased source on the subject: | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | appreciatorBus an hour ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Genspect, which is also a biased source on the subject: Organization that supports position <x> supports position <x>. If Genspect can be discarded as being a biased source, then so can WPATH and every other org supporting gender ideology. Given the fraught nature of the debate, Wikipedia seems like a poor source for determining the bias of players in the debate - the most passionate debaters have plenty of time to just edit Wikipedia. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||