Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

▲

marssaxman 3 hours ago

It does both! There is no natural law which prevents the formation of a monopoly.

▲

WalterBright 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> It does both!

No, it does not concentrate wealth. Wealth is not a fixed pie. In a free market, you get wealthy by creating wealth, not concentrating it.

As for monopolies, competition is what prevents them.

▲

krastanov an hour ago | parent | next [-]

This sounds incredibly naive. Competition does not magically prevent monopolies -- once you have a dominant player they just buy or undercut the occasional competing startup.

▲

CPLX an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Unregulated capitalism inevitably trends towards a mafia state with an oligarchic structure and concentrated monopolistic power. It’s just an empirical fact at this point.

The engine that really drives innovation and wealth creation is regulated capitalism that preserves competitive markets by restraining anticompetitive behavior.

If you’re ideologically attached to capitalism I have good news for you. That’s the approach that leads to its most effective implementation.

If you’re ideologically attached to “market fundamentalism” as I suspect, which is a reflexive opposition to regulation, then this concentrated market structure is what you’re advocating for.

	▲	andsoitis 10 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		> Unregulated capitalism inevitably trends towards a mafia state with an oligarchic structure and concentrated monopolistic power. It’s just an empirical fact at this point. Has there ever been a jurisdiction with unregulated capitalism? I'm unaware of any. Even the most laissez-faire economies had some bedrock legal infrastructure: property rights enforcement, contract law, courts, which are themselves a form of regulation. Pure unregulated capitalism is more of a theoretical concept associated with anarcho-capitalism than a historical reality.