| ▲ | throwanem 19 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I remember thinking of him as a skillful writer and a sometimes incisive thinker, back then. Apparently my taste has significantly improved in the interim; for a piece ostensibly about complexity, this is an embarrassingly superficial analysis from priors that already don't make any sense. I'm not going to knock a guy today based on an almost twenty-year-old piece, especially on subjects (cannabis legalization, the quality and direction of Obama administration policy initiatives) that were widely misunderstood at the time, including by such luminaries as the Nobel committee. But Yegge really wasn't starting from so strong a position as I had misrecalled. Thanks for the link. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | NateEag 18 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
I haven't read it in at least ten years myself - maybe it's not as good as I recall. I do remember that I appreciated his grasp of the fact that if you aren't deep in the weeds, you really cannot understand just how complex a system really is. I also appreciated the slow build to the actual point, which I think could help people who wouldn't hear a direct explanation understand what he was getting at. "'Shit's Easy' syndrome" is real, and I wonder if the prevalence of LLMs doing the scutwork will lead to an entire generation of programmers who suffer from it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||