| ▲ | afavour 6 hours ago |
| This isn't Israel the state, it's a private company that's based in Israel. |
|
| ▲ | tsimionescu 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If you think for a second that the Israeli state allows this company to sell its services to anyone who is opposed to their interests, you really don't understand how defense companies and states work. |
|
| ▲ | vrganj 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sure, a private company that just happens to have had multiple former Mossad directors on their board. Coincidences are funny sometimes :-) |
|
| ▲ | amarcheschi 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That's like saying that Raytheon doesn't advance US interests in the world |
|
| ▲ | asadm 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| gee I wonder what does the private company gain from defaming another country's "pro-Palestine" party. |
| |
| ▲ | afavour 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | ...money? My point is a simple one: the company was hired by someone. Was it the opposition party? To say this is entirely Israel's doing implies the Slovenian party that benefits just happens to have gotten lucky. The reality is likely considerably murkier than that. | | |
| ▲ | tsimionescu 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Any company that sells this type of services exists as an extension of its parent state. Any contract it offers, especially to a political entity in another state, will be scrutinized by state authorities and allowed by them or not. Sometimes, those contracts will be forced on the company based on state-level negotiations. Noone is saying that the party that contracted this company (if indeed it was a Slovenian party and not the Israeli state itself) for this service doesn't carry blame. But both the company itself and the state of Israel carry just as much blame for offering, permitting, and carrying out such services. By your logic, if someone were to found a legal private paid assassin company in France, and then the opposition party in Germany hired this company to assassinate the German chancellor, you'd say that it's unfair for Germany to blame France for this. | |
| ▲ | vrganj 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Would Black Cube have accepted a client that was very pro-Palestinian and was trying to lure voters away from the pro-Israel party? | |
| ▲ | wat10000 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | And to say it's not Israel's doing implies that Israel just happens to have gotten lucky. | |
| ▲ | bigyabai 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | To say that this is entirely the Slovenian party's fault implies that Israel cannot govern their own state. Both are complicit. | | |
| ▲ | margalabargala 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | > implies that Israel cannot govern their own state Or more simply that what the Israeli company did, is not illegal in Israel. | | |
| ▲ | bigyabai 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | I can guarantee you that it is very illegal if you target the wrong government. Selective prosecution is a recurring issue under Israeli jurisprudence. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | postsantum 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| NED is not a CIA front sweatie, it's just a private institute |
| |
| ▲ | mrexcess 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | >NED is not a CIA front sweatie Curious: can you show the research steps you took to reach this conclusion? Really curious how we can all easily determine which companies are and aren't CIA fronts! |
|
|
| ▲ | chiengineer 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Oh thats adorable |