| ▲ | friendzis 2 hours ago | |
It means it's strictly unavailable for ~80% of people out there on Windows/Linux/Android? | ||
| ▲ | AdamN 19 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
It's a business - they're targeting revenues. Making it multi-platform would take alot of effort and the value just isn't there for them right now. The smart move is for them to become awesome on iOS (maybe they're close?) and then create an Android CX. BTW, them being iOS-only means they're probably getting lots of marketing support from Apple and other perks. That can really help a startup. | ||
| ▲ | ohhman11 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
>It means it's strictly unavailable for ~80% of people out there on Windows/Linux/Android? Those platforms don't generate revenue | ||
| ▲ | ymolodtsov an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I've seen many developers who released the same app on both iOS and Android and realized that Apple platforms still provide them with 80% of revenue for 20% of users. Not that many people on Android are willing to pay $60 for an app. | ||
| ▲ | simonklitj 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Yes, but the question is how it makes money, not whether it could make more money by expanding into other OS’s. | ||