| ▲ | bradley13 2 hours ago | |
We don't want age verification, and we do want E2E encryption. Yet, because Meta is an evil company, we cheer on this judgement. Reality, folks: you can't have both. | ||
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | vaylian an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Those two things are unrelated to each other. And yes, we can do without age verification and we can have E2E encryption. Age verification is causing more harm than good. It also doesn't meaningfully help with any of the problems mentioned in the article. | ||
| ▲ | duskdozer an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Well, assuming you won't also think it's okay for Meta to just be held liable anyway. There are people who are against age verification just on principle and others who are against it because they know any realistic implementation is going to be abused. | ||
| ▲ | dgxyz an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Can we just agree we just don’t want Meta? | ||